Monday 30 November 2015

Here's What The Replacement For No Child Left Behind Looks Like

George W. Bush’s signature education law is now widely disliked on the left and right. This month, Congress will vote on a replacement that has bipartisan support.

Charles Dharapak / ASSOCIATED PRESS

After 14 years, George W. Bush's much-maligned No Child Left Behind law is on the verge of being replaced. It's sequel is called the "Every Student Succeeds Act," the final version of which was released today. With bipartisan support, it is likely to cause real changes in American classrooms.

Congress has been trying unsuccessfully for eight years to replace No Child Left Behind, which expired in 2007 and is disliked by both liberals and conservatives. This bill is expected to finally make it through Congress, with the House and Senate set to vote on the law in the coming weeks.

Here's a few things worth knowing about the Every Student Succeeds Act:

The new law gets rid of many of No Child Left Behind's most controversial provisions — most notably the rules for how much schools must improve their test scores each year, and the cascading series of punishments for those who fail to make "adequate yearly progress" on tests.

Fred Dufour / AFP / Getty Images


View Entire List ›

Saturday 28 November 2015

Tales From The Global Hoverboard Gold Rush

Steve Jennings / Getty Images

If you’re in the market for a hoverboard these days, you’re unlikely to have much luck with America’s biggest retailers, none of whom are carrying the self-balancing scooters in their stores. Instead, you might end up doing business with a Swedish teenager.

Gustav Lundin, a 16-year-old student in Sweden, sells the devices online at $550 each, from a base of operations in his parents' garage.

Lundin lives in the small city of Gävle, about two hours' drive north of Stockholm, and controls only the tiniest sliver of the global hoverboard market. But his little website, Astowheels.com (tagline: "One Step Ahead"), resembles countless others that enterprising souls have set up through the e-commerce platform Shopify. In the absence of dominant brands being pushed by major retailers, the hoverboard business has become a massive cottage industry — and a massively fragmented one.

The boards themselves have become something close to a commodity, made in roughly identical fashion by numerous Chinese factories. The white-label products are resold by middlemen large and small, under the kind of dinky, half-baked brands you would associate with a pop-up stall selling cheap mobile phone covers in a suburban mall. Basic computer skills and enough cash to place a bulk order with a manufacturer or distributor is all you need to become an online hoverboard merchant. That, and a fair amount of gumption.

Lundin has plenty of that. The teen has been wheeling and dealing since he was a kid, when he sold four-leaf clovers. He moved on to selling e-cigarettes and mobile chargers. "I would rather do business than go to school,” he told BuzzFeed News. "When I come home from school, I do business. When I wake up, I do business. On the weekend, I do business."

"I want to get the biggest hoverboard store out there," he said. "I want to be the top one."

Ethan Miller / Getty Images

Fifteen years ago, it was a different two-wheeled novelty that captured the nation’s attention.

The Razor scooter, introduced to the U.S. in 2000, sold more than five million units in its first year, and by 2010, it had sold 35 million. There’s little reliable data on hoverboard sales, but it’s safe to assume they are far from Razor territory. And one big reason why, according to the Razor founder, is that the company had unambiguous patents covering the scooter, and quickly crushed the imitators and black-market brands with a flurry of lawsuits.

“When something is this popular, there’s a lot of people who immediately make it regardless of the patent and don't care about patents at all,” said Carlton Calvin, who remains president of Razor USA after co-founding the company more than a decade ago. “We had a huge problem with that when we first began too.” According to Calvin, Razor USA sued more than 20 sellers of copycat scooters and received injunctions against them in the early 2000s.

“It makes it more difficult, for sure, for the market to develop when there’s a lot of controversy about the patents,” he said. “In our case, it was very clear we had the patent. One of my advantages is I was a lawyer before I was a businessperson, and my wife was a lawyer. We used her firm to do the litigation. We were able to do it very quickly and we were very familiar with the process.”

For now, nobody has managed to do with hoverboards what Razor did with scooters. (To be fair, Razor scooters were a lot cheaper at $100 a pop.) There’s no single dominant brand, no dominant owner of intellectual property rights, and nobody with a sales channel that reaches into Main Street stores across the country.

But the latest entrant to the market has 15 years of experience doing just that. That’s because Razor USA is getting into the hoverboard business.

In mid-November, BuzzFeed News reported the company has purchased exclusive rights to a patent by inventor Shane Chen for a “two-wheel, self-balancing personal vehicle” that he has been selling under the Hovertrax brand name. Chen’s patent has yet to be tested against competitors selling their own brands in the U.S., but Razor has the resources and know-how to get its product into the market in a big way — and take on competitors selling knockoffs.

Razor declined to comment on specific legal actions, but its vice president of marketing told BuzzFeed News “it’s fair to say that Razor always enforces its intellectual property rights. As the exclusive licensee, we would expect to do the same with the Hovertrax.” The company expects its hoverboard to be on sale at major retailers' websites by the second week of December, though didn't say if it would make it into stores.

The company is already well aware of the potential market for two-wheeled electric people movers. It has sold tens of millions of its signature scooter over the last decade and a half, and in recent years, its sales of electric scooters have taken off.

“We sell so many I don’t even want to say the number because I don’t want other people to do it,” Calvin said in an interview before the Hovertrax acquisition. “That has been growing steadily for probably 10 years but again, exploded maybe five or six years ago. It’s much bigger than the non-powered scooters.”

While Razor has the experience in rolling out a dominant two-wheeled device, it rose to the top of the market back in the early 2000s, when e-commerce was still in its infancy, social media didn’t exist, and old-school retail techniques still ruled the business. Calvin is aware that things have changed since the scooters burst into the public consciousness.

“The concept of the internet was big but the actual people buying on the internet was not nearly what it is today,” he said. “The only way to sell things was with retailers, basically. I’m sure there were internet people too, but we were really focused on retail distribution and stopping counterfeiters and people violating our patents in retail.”

As the patent situation slowly untangles itself, the country’s biggest retailers are keeping themselves at arm's distance from the market. Toys R Us confirmed to BuzzFeed News that it will sell self-balancing scooters online in time for the holiday season and perhaps in select stores, while Walmart recently reneged on its plans to carry the device online for the holidays.

The about-face of the world’s biggest retailer underscores how splintered the market is: Walmart said in September that it expected self-balancing scooters to be a “hot holiday gift,” even “as hot as the Razor scooter.” One month later, it said it “probably won’t have it for the holiday season.” When asked if the decision was related to the patent battle, a spokesperson said: “I wouldn’t peg it to that. That’s one of the factors of course, but we’re looking at all the factors. There are myriad factors that go into a decision like this.”

Brookstone, a store whose entire brand seems built to embrace the blue LED lights and half-baked futurism of the hoverboard, briefly sold the IO Hawk model online, but has since pulled the item from its website and taken down a promotional video. A few steps away from a Brookstone store in downtown San Francisco’s Westfield Mall, a kiosk now has hoverboards on proud display under a different brand: Smart Drifterz. (A Brookstone store manager told BuzzFeed News that the thorny legal situation around the hoverboards factored into the company’s decision, though requests for official comment were not returned.)

Target exhibited some of the retail disarray around hoverboards in an exchange with BuzzFeed News. On Oct. 19, an external spokesperson for the company confirmed Target will sell a version of the board on Cyber Monday, online only. The next day, she said “there’s a change in direction — Target will not be offering a hoverboard this holiday season.” A few hours later, an internal spokesperson followed up to say: “We’re still working through plans and looking to carry them online. Just nothing concrete to share at this point.” On Nov. 13, the company said it will carry the $500 self-balancing Swagway board on its website, where it’s available now.

“This is a hot item for the holiday season and we needed to find a vendor that could provide us with adequate inventory,” a spokesperson said in an email.

RadioShack said it will not be carrying the hoverboard this season while Best Buy, as of Oct. 21, didn’t have any idea as to whether or not it will be selling the product.

Consumers are better served online where sites like eBay and Amazon have page after page of hoverboard listings. An eBay spokesperson said a hoverboard is sold once per minute on the site, which has more than 10,000 hoverboard listings going into the holiday shopping season.

eBay / Via ebay.com

Although the big stores are staying out of the fray, the opacity of the market means mom-and-pop stores are also struggling to get a piece of the action. One store that started carrying hoverboards this summer, when the craze was just taking off, was Flying Point, a small chain of surf shops in the Hamptons on New York's Long Island. The devices generated considerable buzz among the affluent vacationers in Sag Harbor and other upscale towns. "I saw these kids flying down the streets on them," said Jamison Ernest, a venture capitalist in New York. "It looked amazing."

But selling them was another matter.

Flying Point purchased its hoverboards from a Kansas City, Missouri, company called MonoRover, which in turn bought them from a factory in southern China. But Molly Lucas, who manages a Flying Point location in Southampton, soon discovered she was being undersold by her own supplier. While Flying Point sold the hoverboards for $850 in its stores — at a markup that Lucas said left her with only a thin profit — MonoRover was selling the same devices on its own website for just $599.

Customers noticed. "I feel like a complete asshole when someone's like, 'Well, I can get it online for $200 cheaper,'" Lucas said. "In this day and age where you can buy everything online, we price-match everything. But we can't with this."

MonoRover's president, Lucas Assenmacher, said he recommended that distributors sell the hoverboards for a minimum of $599. At that price, he said, distributors like Flying Point could still earn a "fair margin."

Still, Molly Lucas said, selling the hoverboards was "nothing but a pain in the ass.”

Christopher Furlong / Getty Images

Selling hoverboards may be a pain in the ass, but wait until you fall off one. Social media is littered with evidence of disastrous tumbles, and in the kind of freewheeling tech and creative-industry offices where the boards have become a favored gadgets, tales of epic crashes are widespread.

Some, including Razor USA’s Carlton Calvin, say hoverboards remind them in some ways of Heelys, the shoes with built-in roller skates in their heels, which became ragingly popular among 6- to 14-year-olds in the mid-2000s. The company is a cautionary tale for trendy wheeled gadgets that look cool but lead to a lot of people hurting themselves.

Heelys went public at the end of 2006, at the height of the brand’s popularity. The company was pulling in close to $200 million in annual sales at the time, and was valued at more than $1 billion.

But it never got to $200 million in sales. After another strong year, its revenue began evaporating at a startling pace as injuries mounted and the trend faded. Accidents involving roller shoes led to about 1,600 emergency room visits in 2006, the Associated Press reported.

The company, which hinged its success entirely on wheeled shoes, desperately sought to diversify into non-wheeled footwear and was confident enough in its ability to turn itself around that it rejected a $143 million takeover offer from Skechers in 2008 as "inadequate."

Ultimately, Heelys’ revenue dwindled down to around $30 million a year in 2011 — the next year, it agreed to be purchased by Sequential Brands for about $63 million. Have you seen many kids wearing Heelys lately?

If hoverboards ultimately end up looking more like the briefly trendy wheeled shoes than the durably popular Razor scooter, it might be because they're simply not safe. Ernest, the New York venture capitalist, said he was initially excited by the prospects for the industry, but hasn't considered any investments in the field due to the risk of injury liabilities.

He knows the risk firsthand. Trying out a hoverboard at a friend's house, he took a hard fall onto a tile floor, fracturing his wrist.

instagram.com

The hoverboard industry, Ernest said, "is going to have tremendous liabilities as soon as somebody really cracks their skull open or gets killed on one." Police departments around the world have begun reminding the public that in many jurisdictions — including New York, London, and Sydney — riding a hoverboard on public footpaths or roads is illegal.

“I don’t want to be the Christmas Grinch, but I want people to know and send a message that these new toys have real safety concerns,” said a statement this week by Duncan Gay, the minister for roads in New South Wales, Australia’s most populous state. “Riders endanger themselves because they’re unprotected around other vehicles.”

youtube.com

Few hoverboarders would be reckless enough to take one for a spin on a highway, and for now, indoor spaces remain the board’s most welcoming terrain. But risks remain, even on carpeted corporate floors under bright fluorescent light.

Tales of hoverboard injuries and near-misses in American offices are abundant, and disaster has struck many in the world of startups and technology. Rob Rhinehart, the founder and CEO of Soylent, ambled around Los Angeles in a medical boot earlier this year after busting his ankle falling from one of the boards.

BuzzFeed’s offices in New York and San Francisco have each hosted spectacular hoverboard crashes. In Manhattan, one author of this article went down so thoroughly that a trash can was destroyed in the process; in San Francisco, bureau chief Mat Honan introduced his ass to the floor in a manner one onlooker described as “poetic...like a cartoon man slipping on a banana peel.”

Omar Choudhry, a designer at Whipp, a startup in London, said he was thrown from his hoverboard (which he purchased from someone he met through a friend) when the battery suddenly died. He narrowly missed smashing his face into the edge of a glass table. But Yousif Al-Dujaili, Whipp’s co-founder, remains a big hoverboard fan regardless.

"It's almost like Jedi mind tricks,” he said. “Use the Force. Think about where you want to go."

Thursday 26 November 2015

Kmart Chief Says 6 A.M. Thanksgiving Openings Are "Great Fun" For Staff

The company opened stores early Thursday morning, and won’t close them until late Friday night. It’s a time staff “actually look forward to,” its president says.

Kmart / Via blackfriday.com

Earlier this week, BuzzFeed News was given an intriguing offer: interview the president of Kmart, sometime around 5 a.m. Thanksgiving morning.

Alasdair James, who took the top job at the company just over a year ago after working at U.K. retailer Tesco, would be up early, a representative said, and keen to talk about holiday shopping and Black Friday live from a Detroit Kmart ahead of the chain's 6 a.m. Thursday opening — the start of a 40 hour non-stop shopping marathon that would end at 10 p.m. on Friday.

It seemed a little bizarre to discuss the suggested topics — what's "hot for holiday" and the chain's exclusive Adam Levine and Nicki Minaj lines — at the ungodly hour of 5 a.m. on Thanksgiving morning. But intrigue outweighed incredulity. Why was Kmart opening at 6 a.m. on Thanksgiving? Did the notion of Black Friday strike James as strange at all, especially after working at a British grocer for the last five years?

And why did the last line of his corporate bio describe him as "a man who would rather take the long route in a sports car than the short route in a limousine?" Was this 40-hour Kmart marathon the equivalent of a "long route in a sports car?"

We never addressed the sports car versus limousine angle, but I groggily spoke to James, and a couple of production people, on the phone at 5 a.m. Thursday morning from one of Kmart's rare 24-hour locations. His enthusiasm was palpable.

"I joined the organization last year just before Black Friday so this is the first time I've experienced the fun of Black Friday in full," said James, who is British. "This is not an event that really happens in the UK or in China where I worked before and therefore it's new for me in that respect."


View Entire List ›

How Black Friday Became A Thing: A Tale 140 Years In The Making

From a gold market crash in the 1860s to awful traffic in Pennsylvania 100 years later, the name of America’s annual shopping frenzy has a long history.

For more than a century, American retailers have ramped up marketing and discounts in the days after Thanksgiving, especially on Friday, which is now widely known as Black Friday.

For more than a century, American retailers have ramped up marketing and discounts in the days after Thanksgiving, especially on Friday, which is now widely known as Black Friday.

Jeff J Mitchell / Getty Images

For years, "Black Friday" referred to the crash of the gold market on Sept. 24, 1869.

For years, "Black Friday" referred to the crash of the gold market on Sept. 24, 1869.

The term was used for other Wall Street crashes in subsequent years. This clip is from the New York Herald in November 1871, describing lawsuits against speculators Jay Gould and Jim Fisk.

The New York Herald/Newspapers.com / Via newspapers.com

Michal Cizek/AFP / Getty Images


View Entire List ›

Wednesday 25 November 2015

Startup Zenefits Under Scrutiny For Flouting Insurance Laws

Zenefits founder Parker Conrad speaks at a conference in New York in 2013.

Brian Ach / Getty Images

The Silicon Valley startup Zenefits, valued at $4.5 billion in a funding round earlier this year, apparently flouted insurance laws by allowing unlicensed brokers to sell health insurance — an approach that has led to at least one regulatory inquiry into the legality of its operations.

Zenefits, a middleman in the health insurance business, has repeatedly failed to enforce legal requirements that anyone selling a health insurance policy have an appropriate state license, a BuzzFeed News investigation has found. The San Francisco-based company allowed numerous salespeople to act as insurance brokers in at least seven states without licenses to do so, according to internal emails and records, as well as interviews with eight former employees with direct knowledge of the matter.

BuzzFeed News has reviewed examples of the unlicensed sale of insurance by Zenefits employees dating back as far as the summer of 2014 and continuing through this summer. It is unclear when the practice began and whether it continues today; the company says it now has strict procedures in place to enforce licensing rules.

At least one regulator, the insurance commissioner in Washington state, is currently examining whether Zenefits operated there without licenses, according to a spokesperson for the agency, Stephanie Marquis. The Washington inquiry began in early 2015 and has not yet been resolved, she said.

Zenefits management seemed aware of the potentially serious consequences of violating licensing rules. Under Washington law, anyone who knowingly sells, solicits, or negotiates insurance without the proper state license is guilty of a Class B felony, which can carry a prison sentence of up to 10 years, as well as a civil penalty of up to $25,000 for each violation.

“You are putting the company at risk” by not “immediately” getting broker licenses in Washington, Niji Sabharwal, a Zenefits senior sales operations manager, told sales reps in April.

Upon learning of the Washington inquiry, Zenefits scrambled to get its house in order. Sales reps who had closed deals in that state were told of the inquiry by a Zenefits senior sales operations analyst, Erin Stephens, in an email in early April. The subject line read, “URGENT -- Get Licensed in Washington.”

The email, and two follow-up notes, were sent on a Thursday. On the following Monday, 22 Zenefits employees became licensed brokers in Washington, state records show. Four others received their Washington licenses later that month.

Only this July, more than two years after Zenefits launched, did the company introduce a standardized “license management system” to track whether sales reps had licenses, an internal email shows. (Earlier efforts at license tracking were not comprehensive, according to two former employees.) That email, sent by Sabharwal to managers who oversaw sales reps, acknowledged that there were still “a few reps” who hadn’t yet received licenses “but are currently working deals.”

While Zenefits sales reps were told that they needed licenses to do their job, managers in many cases showed a blase attitude toward the requirement, pushing the unlicensed reps to meet sales quotas, the former employees said. In several cases, sales reps who had failed a broker license exam once or more times were allowed to continue working the phones. At least one person who lacked any license in any state but hit his sales quotas last fall was promoted, according to state records and former employees.

“It is — and has always been — Zenefits’ policy that every individual who sells insurance at Zenefits, as well as the company itself, must be licensed to sell insurance,” Zenefits said in a written statement provided to BuzzFeed News by a spokesman, Kenneth Baer. “Zenefits has more than 280 active resident insurance licenses and more than 2,500 active non-resident licenses, and these licensed brokers have sold thousands of insurance policies over the past two-and-a-half years.”

“We have taken corrective action, including terminating the employee, when we have learned of violations, either because individuals failed to pass the brokerage exam or have otherwise violated our licensing policies,” the statement continued. “Any accusations of other individuals violating our licensure policies will be thoroughly investigated, and we will take appropriate remedial action.”

Zenefits gives away free software to small businesses to manage their employee benefits, though fundamentally it is an insurance brokerage firm, collecting recurring commissions when it sells health insurance policies to those businesses. It says its technology and user-friendliness can help it displace stodgy insurance brokers and claim their lucrative commissions.

The insurance brokerage industry is heavily regulated, and technological innovation has historically been slow to take hold. Many conventional brokers still rely on mountains of forms and spreadsheets — enhancing the appeal of Zenefits for customers who resent paperwork and value speed. On the other hand, conventional brokers argue that an important part of their job is to provide advice gained from study and experience, something that can’t easily be replicated by fresh-faced sales reps and sophisticated software.

Zenefits’ strategy for disrupting this industry — where human lives literally are at stake — has typified the current tech boom: rapid growth, with little regard for the conventions of old-school industries.

“If you’re an insurance broker, we’re going to drink your milkshake,” Parker Conrad, the Zenefits co-founder and CEO, said at a tech event in 2013.

Among new startups of recent years, few have generated as much praise from investors and reporters as Zenefits. Launched only in 2013, it quickly grew into a Silicon Valley “unicorn,” with a $4.5 billion valuation as of May. Forbes called it the “hottest startup” of 2014. Business Insider said it was a startup “to bet your career on in 2015.”

The Hollywood celebrities Ashton Kutcher and Jared Leto are investors in the privately held company. A Silicon Valley celebrity, the former PayPal executive David Sacks, is its chief operating officer. Its other backers include the mutual fund giant Fidelity and the big private equity investor TPG, as well as the prominent venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which has invested more money in Zenefits than in any other startup in its portfolio. (Andreessen Horowitz is also an investor in BuzzFeed.)

Virginia Mayo / Associated Press

The revelation about unlicensed brokers, which has never previously been made public, comes as the company is facing questions about its ability to live up to its lofty valuation. Fidelity, which bought Zenefits shares in the May investment round, marked down the value of its stake by 48% as of the end of September, according to data from the investment research company Morningstar. While Zenefits has said it hopes to hit $100 million in annual revenue by January, one indicator suggested the figure had reached only $45 million by August, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report. The Zenefits spokesman declined to comment on that report.

Zenefits is among a class of richly valued startups that have taken an aggressive stance toward longstanding industry rules. Uber and Airbnb, for example, have shown that it can be a winning strategy to clash with state and city governments over rules that the startups claim are outmoded or unfair. Zenefits got a taste of this sort of battle late last year, when Utah insurance regulators sought to block the company from operating there over claims that its free software amounted to an improper inducement for customers. (Utah allowed Zenefits back in this year.)

The sale of insurance is governed at the state level. In every state, brokers who sell health insurance policies to companies based there are required to have a license from that state. Many brokers interpret the laws to mean that they need a license not only to sell insurance but also to discuss it with clients in any meaningful way.

In California, where many Zenefits customers are located, the law says people can't "solicit, negotiate, or effect contracts of insurance" without a license. An important exemption is for clerical and support work, like setting up appointments or gathering basic information from customers. Under California law, selling insurance without a valid license is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $50,000 or up to a year in prison.

Zenefits itself is a licensed brokerage company and Conrad, the CEO, has a broker license in all 50 states. But the employees who do the selling are also legally required to be licensed brokers in the states where they work.

"Whether you’re selling through an app or through a brick-and-mortar store, you have to be licensed” in every state in which you sell insurance policies, said Adam Beck, a professor of health insurance at the American College of Financial Services in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. "Working for someone who happens to be licensed in not sufficient."

The unlicensed sale of insurance is challenging for regulators to catch, largely because there is no public database of insurance policies sold. Regulators generally rely on tips, including from customers, who can check whether their broker is licensed using state databases like this one, this one, or this one.

“When we started Zenefits, we followed a practice common to many small independent brokerages of having each broker licensed in their home state and having the agency itself also registered in all 50 states so as to allow out-of-state sales,” Zenefits said in its statement. “As we grew and heard from regulators that they wanted each licensed broker individually to acquire a non-resident license, we set out to do just that.”

Conrad speaks at a conference in San Francisco in 2015

Steve Jennings / Getty Images

The Zenefits sales force is run by Sam Blond, the San Francisco-based vice president of sales. He joined the company in late 2013 after quickly rising through the sales organization at EchoSign, a software startup that was sold to Adobe in 2011. Many of the apparently unlicensed insurance sales occurred in Zenefits’ big satellite office in Scottsdale, Arizona, which opened in the fall of last year and quickly filled up with hundreds of employees. But there is evidence of unlicensed selling of insurance in Zenefits’ San Francisco headquarters as well.

One Zenefits sales rep who didn’t have a license in any state closed insurance deals with at least 27 companies, starting in February and continuing through June, an internal document shows. The sales rep, who was based in Scottsdale and left Zenefits this summer, convinced eight of the companies to enroll in new health insurance, according to the document. He convinced 19 companies to make Zenefits their broker of record, the document shows. The states where he closed deals included Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, and New Jersey.

In San Francisco, a different sales rep, who started in June 2014, sold a health insurance policy to a New York-based startup called Goodsie during her first months on the job. Conrad had personally reached out several times to woo Goodsie, which provides e-commerce software to businesses, but he bowed out and let the rep take over, emails show. This sales rep, however, lacked a New York broker license until June of this year, state records show.

Among the 22 Zenefits employees who got insurance licenses in Washington on the Monday after being warned about the regulatory inquiry, nine were based in Scottsdale, state records and their LinkedIn profiles show. The other 13 were in San Francisco.

Three of the former Zenefits employees interviewed by BuzzFeed News, refusing to speak on the record for fear of professional or legal consequences, acknowledged that they routinely pitched or sold health insurance policies without adequate licensing. Three others said they supervised the sale of health insurance by unlicensed sales reps.

"I made like $15,000 in the time I was there, just on commissions. And I never got my license," said an insurance salesperson who left Zenefits this summer. She estimated she had more than 100 conversations with different customers about insurance. "I took my test three times in a row, and I failed. They still let me work."

Without her license, she had to improvise on calls with customers.

When faced with a tricky question, "I would just Google it,” she said. She would tell the customer, "hold on one second, let me email the expert, he's on the line, hold on one second, I'll get back to you.” But in reality, “I would pick one of the first three links and I would just go off of that."

A large number of the new hires in the Scottsdale office came from other technology companies, with experience in sales but little familiarity with health insurance. Zenefits offered to pick up the cost of studying for and taking the broker test, several former employees said. But new sales reps there soon discovered that getting licensed wasn’t seen as an urgent priority. More important was hitting sales quotas, which initially would increase each month.

Those who hit the quotas, even if they lacked broker licenses, were rewarded, the former employees said. One of the earliest hires for the Scottsdale office started as a health insurance sales rep in September 2014, according to his LinkedIn profile and interviews with two former colleagues. He was promoted in January to a sales manager job, which would not necessarily require a broker license, and he was promoted again last month.

This sales rep had no broker license until September of this year, when he got a license in California, according to a search of every state insurance database for his name. After BuzzFeed News first attempted to contact him for this article, he got licenses in states including Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Louisiana, Nevada, Oregon, and Virginia, state records show.

Once an insurance broker gets a license in one state, they can pay a fee and fill out information online to have the credential replicated in other states where they do business. But even this simple task eluded many sales reps. One former sales rep who started in the Scottsdale office last fall said he had an Arizona license but didn’t bother to get licenses in the other states where he was selling insurance until January, when Blond instructed sales reps to focus on particular states.

Even after that instruction, sales reps had a relaxed attitude toward the licensing requirements, former employees said. Another former sales rep said he procrastinated after passing his broker exam, waiting two months before filling out the paperwork to get his first license this spring. In the meantime, he sold insurance.

Washington state regulators delivered a jolt to Zenefits, however. On April 2, just after 2 p.m., Stephens, the senior sales operations analyst, sent an email to sales reps who had "closed business in Washington in 2014 or 2015 without providing your licensing information to the sales operations team (thus, Zenefits at large.)"

She said Zenefits faced "an inquiry" from Washington's insurance regulator into the company's business practices. "As part of the response," she said, "we must list out every broker who deals with Washington clients and their WA license number. This requires that we gather all licensing information from individual reps" -- this part was underlined and in red lettering -- "TODAY by 4:00 PM."

"If you are not licensed in Washington, take 5 minutes to complete the process on NIPR," Stephens added, referring to the website that lets people apply to transfer their credentials to other states. She told sales reps to add their confirmation numbers to a Google doc after completing online applications.

Not everyone who received the email appeared to grasp its urgency.

“Drop what you are doing and submit the application to get licensed in WA,” read a bolded sentence in a follow-up email, sent just after 6 p.m. by Sabharwal, the senior sales operations manager.

“This is the third communication on this. It takes less than 10 mins,” he continued. “You are putting the company at risk by not doing this immediately.”

Months later, in July, unlicensed insurance sales were apparently still a problem. In the July 6 email announcing the license management system, Sabharwal said Zenefits would “now be able to prevent a rep from closing a deal if they are not licensed to sell into that state.”

“This is an area of great concern as the consequences of breaking these rules can be detrimental to our ability to operate in that state,” he continued.

In its written statement, Zenefits said, “As we have grown, so have our compliance procedures.” Zenefits said job offer letters to sales reps now specify licensing requirements, and that the company’s internal software systems now include licensing checks as part of the sales process.

A week after Sabharwal’s email, licensing information for a number of sales reps still hadn’t been entered into the new system, according to another email from him. The email, which Sabharwal sent to sales managers on July 13, contained a chart showing “Incomplete Resident Licenses by Manager.” The 16 managers listed by name in the chart corresponded to a combined 33 incomplete records for sales reps.

“A valid license means that they have their license number and expiration date,” Sabharwal reminded the managers. “Just passing the insurance test does not constitute a license.”

The former sales rep who closed at least 27 deals without a broker license appeared to shift his strategy toward the middle of the year, emails to his customers show. In a February email to one small business CEO he was courting, he said, "I primarily am a broker and obtain the responsibility to work with our clients in that capacity."

Later, in interactions with a different company, he appeared to take a more conservative approach. The customer, Defib This, a small company in Santa Cruz, Calif. that runs emergency response training courses, had been "desperately searching for insurance," according to Aki Williams, the chief operating officer.

But Williams was a "little peeved," when the sales rep refused to have any meaningful discussions about insurance policies. "He sent us emails that had multiple options, but we really couldn't pin him down to say, 'This is what's going to work best for your company,'" Williams said.

Williams ended up buying an insurance policy through the sales rep that took effect in July. She said she had no idea that he lacked a broker license.

When Zenefits sought to fix this issue, it declined to pull unlicensed sales reps off the phones entirely, the July 6 email from Sabharwal shows. For new hires going forward, Sabharwal told sales managers, the company would start “requiring reps to have passed their license exams before starting boot camp, which will ensure that they have a license by the time they get on the phones.” But the policy for current sales reps was apparently different.

“There [are] still, however, a few reps who have passed the test, submitted the application, and are awaiting their license number but are currently working deals,” he continued. “We are going to make an exception for these reps and allow them to close deals as long as their manager is on the phone with them.”

Sabharwal emphasized this instruction in his follow-up email on July 13.

“A reminder that if any of your reps do not have a valid license in hand for their resident state (usually CA or AZ), YOU MUST be on every call where insurance is discussed,” he told sales managers.

Two former employees said they participated in such phone calls, in which an unlicensed rep would be supervised by a more senior employee with a broker license. Such a solution, however, falls into a legal gray area, according to William Gausewitz, a Sacramento-based partner at the law firm Michelman & Robinson who formerly was a deputy insurance commissioner at the California Department of Insurance.

"I don't think it complies technically with the licensing laws," Gausewitz said, commenting in general on the practice. "But if the unlicensed people are supervised by a licensed broker, the department is not going to be as suspicious that the agency is engaged in flagrant lawbreaking violations."

Tuesday 24 November 2015

Keurig Admits Its New Soda Machine Has Some Problems

Keurig Green Mountain

When Keurig Green Mountain launched an at-home soft drinl maker called the Keurig Kold in the U.S. earlier this fall, a few things stood out immediately.

It cost $369 — or $299 on promotion — which is steep for a small appliance (Best Buy just started offering it on sale at $200). It ran on plastic, single-serve pods that cost $0.99 to $1.29 each and made a single 8-ounce cup of soda — also pricey, relative to the cost of cans or bottles in the supermarket. And it took 60 to 90 seconds to prepare each drink, calling its ultimate convenience into question.

The company now acknowledges it must address some of these shortcomings. CEO Brian Kelley told investors on an earnings call last week that "consumers love the taste" and, most importantly, "we're delivering a terrific beverage." But Keurig is also "learning a lot about what needs to improve and what we can improve. And we know that the first product we put out in the new technology is never going to be perfect."

The Keurig Kold was launched with popular sodas from Coca-Cola and Dr Pepper Snapple as well as Keurig's own brands of iced teas, sports drinks, and flavored waters. Some looked at the machine as a potential comeback vehicle for Keurig following the bumpy launch of its Keurig 2.0 coffee brewer last year. Sales of the company's coffee maker have been in decline for the last year, and Kold would be its first steps in an entirely new market, driven until now by the SodaStream.

BuzzFeed News

So far, consumers have been skeptical. The Kold has scored a 3.3 out of 5 rating on Amazon.com, putting it somewhere between "It's okay" and "I like it," — below what you'd expect from a much-hyped product the company lauded as a "disruptive countertop-size innovation." On Keurig's own site, Kold got a 3.6 out of 5 rating, which is better than "Ordinary" but not enough for "That's good stuff." The company launched Kold in Canada this week.

Based on current trends and due to the gradual rollout of the Kold machine, Keurig expects to sell 60,000 to 100,000 Kold machines during its first year in the market, still a drop in the bucket compared to the 9.2 million Keurig hot brewers sold in fiscal 2015.

CEO Kelley noted several improvements consumers so far have demanded on the investor call.

"Consumers want it to be smaller," said Kelley.

Keurig Kold is 12-inches wide and 19.25-inches deep (most kitchen countertops are about 25 inches deep). It weighs 23.7 pounds. "The first thing I noticed when I opened the box was, this machine is HUGE. It's pretty bulky and does not fit underneath my kitchen cabinets, so it takes up a lot of counter space," one Best Buy customer wrote in a review.

"They want it to be less expensive."

Consumers pay about $369 for the Kold machine, and some have complained that even at this price, it is "buggy." The appliance is more expensive than Keurig's coffee makers, and is also more than other carbonated water makers, such as SodaStream, which offers models for less than $100. On top of that, each Kold pod costs a lot more than a regular bottle or can at the supermarket. As another Best Buy reviewer put it: "Seriously....buy a 2 liter and use your icemaker. It tastes better and it's reliably cheap."

Keurig plans to gradually offer lower-priced pods, but as its Chief Innovation Officer Kevin Hartley told BuzzFeed News, "The bargain, really large 2-liter and above sizes at really promoted prices, I don't think that will be the Keurig market."

"They want to have more sizes of drinks available."

Especially because each drink takes more than a minute to prepare, it would be nice to be able to make more than an 8-ounce cup at a time, for example, if you are trying to serve guests.

Still, it's worth noting that one of Keurig's big selling points for the 2.0 coffee maker was that it could, unlike earlier models, make either a single cup or a carafe of coffee. That feature wasn't enough to make the 2.0 a hit.

"They want a broader selection of drinks," Kelley said.

On its hot brewers, Keurig offers 60 brands and more than 600 varieties, which has been a strength. "I think in the not too distant future we'll have something like that unbelievably beautiful array of beverages," including all kinds of cold drinks, not just sodas, Hartley said. He adds that the pods will be used as a platform for testing and developing new varieties that might otherwise have no place on retailers' shelves.

Having noted these areas for improvement, the company has not announced any details about when it might launch of the next generation KOLD drink maker.

"Each of these [points] is being addressed and will get addressed both from a machine standpoint and pod standpoint. But it doesn’t happen on the very first machine, we’re going to learn and we’re going to improve," Kelley said on the call.

Of course, any future for Keurig Kold will depend on how consumers respond. "We’re going to be very disciplined and pragmatic in our approach to investment levels over the long term and we’re going to invest only as the marketplace success dictates," Kelley said.

The K-Cup In Crisis

The K-Cup Crisis Continues

Keurig’s Home-Brew Coca-Cola Machine Launches Tuesday


Monday 23 November 2015

The Uber Will See You Now

Jessica Funcannon getting a flu vaccination shot from Nurse Jerry Palacios at her workplace during the UberHealth day in Chicago last year.

Jean-Marc Giboux / AP Images for Uber

Someday, an Uber — not an ambulance — could appear at your door and whisk you to the hospital. Or to a doctor’s appointment. Or it could bring the doctor to wherever you are, whenever you want.

Uber doesn’t have immediate plans to do any of this, but it appears to be laying the groundwork to serve up health care at the tap of a button, just as it has rides and, more recently, food, drugstore necessities, and even kittens.

For four hours on Thursday, Uber customers could summon nurses to administer flu shots for $10; the company hoped to vaccinate as many as 10,000 people across 36 U.S. cities.

More significantly, the company announced this week that it'd hired its first-ever health adviser: John Brownstein, director of the Computational Epidemiology Group at Boston Children’s Hospital.

John Brownstein

LinkedIn / Via linkedin.com

Flu shots are a major public health intervention, but “it’s still not necessarily convenient,” Brownstein, who is also a biomedical informatics professor at Harvard Medical School, told BuzzFeed News. “We had this idea: Why not bring vaccines to people as opposed to making people go to vaccines? Even more broadly, there are so many more opportunities in health care with on-demand logistics technology. … You can imagine transportation’s not always the most available to anyone in need of health care.”

Trained in epidemiology at Yale University, Brownstein co-founded Epidemico, a startup that analyzes data to predict public health problems, in 2007. He first started working with Uber last fall, when it did a one-day trial run of the flu shot program in four cities: Boston; New York City; Washington, D.C.; and Chicago. A total of about 2,050 people were vaccinated, according to a study published Tuesday in Annals of Internal Medicine. Of the 486 who responded to a follow-up survey, 70% said they were somewhat or definitely unlikely to get a flu shot in a traditional way — like in a doctor’s office — and about 80% said the program’s convenience was a significant reason they got vaccinated.

Those figures inspired Uber to expand the service this year. Ten bucks bought patients a “wellness” bag with flu prevention supplies (tissues, hand sanitizer, an Uber water bottle) and the option to request up to 10 free flu shots (for other people on-site, like relatives or co-workers) administered by registered nurses with Passport Health, a travel medicine clinic. Patients had to fill out consent and waiver-of-liability forms, just as they would at a pharmacy, Uber said. (The nurses did not drive themselves, but rode with a mix of UberX and Uber Black drivers, according to Meghan Joyce of Uber.)

Brownstein has big plans for Uber’s foray into health care: He said Uber’s drivers, which now number around 400,000 in the U.S., could someday shuttle patients to clinical trial centers or doctor’s offices, especially for scheduled, repeat visits — or vice versa.

“We know that people don’t follow up on treatments on whatever course of therapy they’re on,” he said. “That can ultimately lead to poor health, but also a huge amount of costs to the health care system. Any way to create more convenience and more options for people to access health care means the overall cost of the health care system is going to come down.” One example he cited: ambulance rides, which can cost up to tens of thousands of dollars.

Uber is already starting to put some of these ideas into practice outside the U.S. The company announced this week a partnership with Practo, whose app now lets users in India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Singapore book medical appointments and request an Uber to travel to them.

Brownstein acknowledged that all plans would have to be delicately implemented, considering how personal and risky health care is. “We’d have to think about liability, the idea of patient privacy — all these concepts are so key and so vital and of course those will be considered as part of any operations we go after,” he said.

Uber wouldn’t be the first startup with an app that lets customers order house calls. Pager does that in New York City and San Francisco; Mend in Dallas; and Heal in Los Angeles, Orange County, San Francisco, and Palo Alto. All are much smaller and relatively less-funded, and all have been described or described themselves as an “Uber for health care.”

Jean-Marc Giboux / AP Images for Uber

Heal’s 100 or so clinicians have provided on-demand primary and urgent care to more than 1,000 patients since it launched last year, according to co-founder Dr. Renee Dua. The doctors have called ambulances for some patients, but they purposely don’t drive patients to the hospital, for the same liability issues that Uber would have to deal with if it went down that route.

“If you were to fracture your wrist and your wrist needs to be stabilized, then you can make your way to an ER or urgent care setting for a splint, and ideally the person doing that splint or stabilizing that bone knows what they’re doing,” Dua told BuzzFeed News. “If they don’t and get you in a car and get you in an awkward position in the car, it can wreak havoc. The person who’s doing this kind of work — and this is why I’m big on the fact we bring a doctor — is very skilled and knowledgeable about what could go wrong if things aren’t handled correctly.”

Dr. Elizabeth Anderson, an internal medicine doctor in Fairfax, Virginia, raised other, bigger questions about Uber’s model. A consistent doctor-patient relationship is crucial because it lessens the chances of errors and gives patients a clear way to follow up with concerns, she said. Prioritizing convenience above all — as in the case of Uber’s on-demand vaccinations — can be dangerous.

Anderson and her colleagues do home visits, but “the difference is we’re their doctors, we have their charts, we have their history,” she said. “I can’t tell you the number of people who get duplications of shots because nobody bothers to check their record.”

“As a society,” she added, “what has happened is that we put expediency and immediacy above other more valuable qualities with regards to health care, and we’re paying for that.”

Jean-Marc Giboux / AP Images for UBER


Walmart: Cyber Monday Is Now On Sunday

Which is in line with how Black Friday is now on Thursday. What is a day if not a rule to be broken?

Walmart / Via walmart.com

Just as most Black Friday sales now begin on Thanksgiving Thursday, Walmart is moving "Cyber Monday" to Sunday.

"The change is aimed at providing a simpler and more convenient experience for customers who are searching the Web on Sunday night and often waiting up past midnight to do their shopping," the world's biggest retailer said in a statement today, emailed shortly after midnight. It will start its deals at 8 p.m. ET on Sunday.

In 2012, most of the nation's biggest retailers started opening on Thanksgiving Day itself for Black Friday sales, a trend that started with controversial midnight openings in 2011 and has continued on into this year. So it makes sense that Cyber Monday is the next to go — though in both instances, it's unclear as to why retailers can't just refer to major sales by naming the proper day of the week.

Cyber Monday was introduced in 2005 by an arm of the National Retail Federation, an industry trade group, according to the New York Times. It came very close to turning 10 years old this year as a true Monday holiday.

The savings seem constant. Right now, Walmart is offering "pre-Black Friday online specials" on its website, shoppable now. It said earlier this month that it will offer the majority of its Black Friday deals on its website starting at 3:01 a.m. ET on Thanksgiving Day, then offer up a "week of savings" afterwards. Broadly, the company said it is all part of "eight weeks of deep savings and holiday retailtainment."

"It can be exhausting for working parents and millenials to stay up past midnight to shop online, only to wake up early the next day to get ready for work," Fernando Madeira, CEO of Walmart.com, said in the statement.

LINK: It Took Only Five Years For Retailers To Conquer Thanksgiving

More Good News For (Some) Techies With Kids

With the White House and big companies like Spotify and Amazon on board, paid parental leave is on the rise in the U.S. — unless you’re a low-wage or contract worker.

Mark Zuckerberg / Via facebook.com

Mark Zuckerberg and his wife are picking out their favorite childhood toys and books, and "every day things are getting a little more real," the Facebook founder wrote in a post Friday. With a daughter on the way, Zuckerberg announced he'll be taking two months of parental leave, noting studies that show "when working parents take time to be with their newborns, outcomes are better for the children and families."

Most new dads are not entitled to that kind of leave, White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett told staff at Spotify's New York office a day before Zuckerberg's announcement. America, she said, is the only developed country without a law guaranteeing time off for employees who have children.

The visit to Spotify on Thursday came as the Swedish company announced all of its employees, regardless of gender, will be given six months of paid parental leave when they have kids. Spearheaded by Chief Human Resources Officer Katarina Berg, the new policy also includes a flexible time-off policy for the month employees return to work.

"If you want to compete effectively, then the case I think you can make to your peers is, this is a very effective tool that will help you," Jarrett said. "Don't look at it as a cost. Look at it as an investment."

Spotify's 1,600 full-time workers, based in 28 offices around the world, will be covered by the policy right away; contract workers, of which a Spotify spokesperson said there are relatively few, will not receive these benefits.

Beyond Spotify, tech companies including Netflix, Microsoft, Adobe, Facebook, and Amazon have announced expanded paid leave programs in recent months. Simultaneously, both the White House and the Department of Labor have been pushing a platform for mandating more generous parental leave. But while it's standard in Silicon Valley to shower corporate employees with generous compensation and perks, those policies rarely trickle down to low-wage workers at the same businesses, and paid leave is no exception.

Like Spotify, many of the tech companies that have publicly announced increased support for new parents did not extend the policy to contractors. But while Spotify's workforce is almost entirely full-time employees, other companies have left a significant portion of their labor force hanging. Contractors sorting packages at an Amazon distribution center or stuffing red envelopes with DVDs at a Netflix warehouse are out of luck for now.

Peter Macdiarmid / Getty Images

While contract workers at Amazon still won't receive paid leave under the company's new policy, it has made strides toward ensuring that at least some of its lower-wage workers see some benefits. Nestled in the new Amazon announcement on paid leave for fathers in October was a new category of covered workers: more than 100,000 warehouse and customer service workers who will receive the benefit for the first time.

This move to cover both salaried and hourly workers (though not part-time or temporary employees) makes Amazon a tech outlier when it comes to paid leave. New birth or adoptive parents who have worked for the company for more than a year will now receive six weeks of paid leave, and new birth mothers may now take up to 20 weeks off, including four weeks prior to giving birth.

The company acknowledged the policy update came in response to employee feedback and as part of an effort to stay competitive as more tech companies offer more generous leave, as the Wall Street Journal first reported.


View Entire List ›

It Only Took Five Years For Retailers To Conquer Thanksgiving

In 2011 Americans were shocked as big retailers opened their stores at midnight on Thanksgiving. Now the same stores open in the middle of the cherished national holiday.

Target's Black Friday hours since 2010.

Michelle Rial/BuzzFeed News

It only took five years Thanksgiving to stop being a day off for retail workers.

As opening at 5 p.m. or 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving Thursday becomes the standard for America's biggest retail chains, it's worth noting how recently and swiftly Black Friday took over this cherished national holiday. Americans were protesting midnight openings on Thanksgiving as recently as 2011 — just four years later, J.C. Penney is opening at 3 p.m. on Thursday, while RadioShack holds its "Black Friday sale" on Wednesday and opens again on Thursday morning. Kmart will open at 6 a.m. on Thanksgiving and remain open for 42 hours straight — and no, 42 hours is not a typo.

"The retailer strategy for as long as there's been retail is you want to be the first thing in the car," Marcie Merriman, a retail strategy and consumer engagement consultant at Ernst & Young, said in an interview with BuzzFeed News. "If you wait until later, there's the risk that you're going to miss the boat… I think that's what drove them from going from Fridays to Thursdays."

While REI got plenty of praise for announcing its stores will stay closed on Black Friday and Thanksgiving, and chains like GameStop and TJX choose to give employees the holiday off, that's not the reality for hundreds of thousands of retail workers.

Some Americans are still protesting Thanksgiving openings on Facebook.

The Middle Class Action Project / Via Facebook: events

For many years, big retailers like Best Buy, Target, and Walmart started Black Friday sales in the early hours of Friday itself, between 4 a.m. and 7 a.m. As the traditional start of the holiday shopping season, Black Friday events typically drew large crowds of customers, waiting for doors to open so they could snag sweet deals on electronics and cashmere sweaters. Some crowds got so aggressive that in 2008, a 34-year-old Walmart employee, a temp for the holiday season, was trampled to death in a stampede after the doors of his New York store broke open.

But most of the nation's big chains didn't touch Thanksgiving itself before 2011.

That year, retailers like Target, Macy's, Best Buy and Kohl's decided to start their Black Friday deals at midnight. It was a new trend the Wall Street Journal referred to as "Black Midnight" in a 2011 headline. The move spurred high-profile petitions, including one from a Target worker who wanted the company to return to its 5 a.m. Friday opening so he could spend Thanksgiving with his fiance's family.


View Entire List ›

Sunday 22 November 2015

Coca-Cola Says Its Mini Cans Are "Reinventing" The Soda Business

Matt Rourke / AP

You might look at Coca-Cola's 7.5-ounce mini-can and shrug it off merely as a slightly smaller Coca-Cola. Shaving 4.5 ounces off the traditional 12-ounce can may seem like no biggie, strategically or physically.

Yet to Coca-Cola, each fewer ounce is a carefully calculated step into The Future.

As sales have declined, Coca-Cola — also owner of brands like Sprite and Fanta — has increased its marketing budget and launched sodas with fewer calories and new sweeteners. But "maybe the most important element in terms of our sparkling [carbonated beverage] portfolio has been the significant and strategic re-architecture of our packaging mix," said Sandy Douglas, the President of Coca-Cola North America, at a conference this week. The new mini-bottles and cans are "the way that we are reinventing" the soda business, he said.

That's a lot of enthusiasm for a small aluminum can. But what's significant about a Coke executive calling little cans and bottles — in other words, less soda — "a core part of our strategy" is the acknowledgement that the American market for soda indeed is getting smaller.


For decades, soft drinks have been seen as high-volume products that people consume frequently. Bottles gradually got bigger starting in the 1950s. Yet what was good for business eventually made calorie-packed sodas a major public health concern; consumers started to curb soda consumption. Coke needs to shift gears.

Enter the mini-can. Offering a downsized alternative to regular cans, is a notable, if also somewhat uncomfortable, decision for the brand. The smaller 90-calorie cans have been around since 2007 (nationally only since 2010), making them a fairly new addition for the 123 year-old company. And with 8.5-ounce aluminum bottles also in the lineup now, the company has added miniaturized alternatives to the 20-ounce plastic bottles commonly found in convenience stores.

Soda makers PepsiCo and Dr Pepper Snapple have their own versions of the downsized drinks.

Coke has reiterated the importance of these new sizes in recent years. As the soda maker said this summer in a blog post "whether it is our mini-cans or small glass bottles, we are better able to provide great-tasting refreshment in moderation."

But can the world's largest beverage company succeed if it embraces a philosophy of moderation?

As Americans drink less soda, the company is trying to roll with the trend.

One of the biggest challenges confronting Coca-Cola is that its main products are sugary drinks, which attract almost tobacco-level scorn among many health-conscious consumers.

It wasn't always that way. For most of it's long history, Coke had a rare, almost universal appeal that helped it dominate globally, available bottled pretty much anywhere on the planet. Coke reigned as the most valuable brand in the world for many years. It has been, in other words, an extraordinary product.

But a growing numbers of consumers are turning against not just Coke, but soda altogether. In a recent Gallup survey, more than six in 10 adults in the U.S. said they were trying to steer clear of the beverages. Public health campaigns have blamed soda for obesity and other health risks. Consumption of soda — including diet soda — has been declining for a decade, although it still averaged an impressive 40 gallons per person in the U.S. in 2014 — about 14 ounces per day.

As public opinion turns against it, the goal now for Coca-Cola is to keep soda in people's diets, even if it's in diminished portions. "Packages by the end of the 90s were all huge, and they were boring," said Douglas. Rather than waging a losing battle to persuade consumers to drink more soda, Coca-Cola's strategy has shifted to accepting that consumers — including kids — will drink less of it.

OMG, these are so 20th century.

OMG, these are so 20th century.

Coca-Cola

"Smaller packages are re-recruiting consumers of all demographics, particularly upper-income consumers and particularly moms, because moms want to treat their kids, but they don’t want them to have too much, they want to be in control," Douglas said at the conference.

The company wants consumers to believe soda can be part of a healthy lifestyle, rather than antithetical to one.

This effort includes plenty of messaging, and not just via the company's uniquitous advertising. In March, the Associated Press reported Coke worked with a number health and fitness experts who had written articles published on blogs and newspaper websites saying small cans of soda could be a useful, portion controlled snack as part of a healthy diet.

"We have a network of dietitians we work with," Ben Sheidler, a Coca-Cola spokesman, told the AP at the time. "Every big brand works with bloggers or has paid talent."

In August the New York Times reported the company has also given significant financial support to a group called the Global Energy Balance Network, which argues Americans have paid too much attention to dietary causes of the obesity epidemic, and should also focus on boosting levels of physical activity and exercise.

Coca-Cola later disclosed hundreds of grants it made "with the best of intentions" for research, partnerships with medical groups, and community health programs over the past five years. The company decided not to renew some contracts due to "budget realities," reported the AP.

As its sales by volume decline, Coca-Cola is making up for it by charging more per ounce for the mini-cans and bottles.

As its sales by volume decline, Coca-Cola is making up for it by charging more per ounce for the mini-cans and bottles.

Coca-Cola / Via phx.corporate-ir.net

The 7.5-ounce cans, for example, cost about $0.40 each while the larger, original 12-once can costs about $0.32. "A 12-ounce can traded to a 7-ounce can is a 30% reduction in volume, but it’s an increase in revenue," said Douglas.

Coca-Cola says the strategy is slowly working. The old standard sizes — the 2-liter bottle and the 12-ounce can, which the company refers to in the chart below as its "core" packages — are in decline. Meanwhile, sales of the new smaller sizes, referred to as "transaction" packages because they encourage soda sales, have grown for years. They now represent 14% of sales compared to 10% in 2011.

"Gallonage is declining," Douglas said. The bright side, in a convoluted sense, is small sodas have "a lot of growth ahead," replacing many of yesterday's binge bottles one sized-down can at a time.

Coca-Cola / Via phx.corporate-ir.net


Friday 20 November 2015

E. Coli Cases Linked To Chipotle Have Spread To California And New York

Joe Raedle / Getty Images

Shortly after reopening its restaurants in Oregon and Washington that were closed due to an outbreak of E. coli, the fast food chain Chipotle is now possibly tied to more incidents of the illness in California, Minnesota, Ohio, and New York, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In a release, the restaurant company explained:

The CDC has informed Chipotle that it identified six additional cases in which initial testing matches the E. coli strain involved in the Washington and Oregon incident. Although one of the individuals has no known link to Chipotle, five individuals did report eating at Chipotle, including two in Turlock, Calif., one in Akron, Ohio, one in Amherst, NY, and one in Burnsville, Minn.

The new incidents bring the total number of people infected with this strain of E. coli since mid-October to 45 people from six states: California (2), Minnesota (2), New York (1), and Ohio (1), in addition to the previous cases in Oregon (13), and Washington (26). Of the total, 16 have been hospitalized so far.

The CDC suspects "a common meal item or ingredient served at Chipotle Mexican Grill restaurants in several states is a likely source of this outbreak." No definitive source was identified in the outbreak in the Northwest, said Chipotle spokesman Chris Arnold in an email.

The company stated in its discussion of risks to its business in its most recent annual report: “We may be at a higher risk for food-borne illness outbreaks than some competitors due to our use of fresh produce and meats rather than frozen, and our reliance on employees cooking with traditional methods rather than automation.”

Chipotle is examining its food preparation procedures and is working with health officials to understand the distribution of food items served at the restaurants where ill people ate.

William Blair analyst Sharon Zackfia said in a report on Friday that some types of Chipotle diner — frequent customers, customers on the West Coast, and new customers, are "most likely to rethink their willingness to eat at Chipotle, which could cause some near-term disruption," but overall, she still expects that "Chipotle to emerge from the incident largely unscathed."

Why Is Chipotle Having So Many Food Safety Issues?


Red Lobster's Shrimp Are Getting 47% Larger

Red Lobster

As Red Lobster proceeds with its turnaround plan, the seafood chain has made a clear determination about its shrimp: they're puny and utterly unfit for the modern, sophisticated scampi eater.

So the Orlando-based company has begun the process of upgrading to larger crustaceans — 47% to 86% larger depending on the dish, to be extremely specific. "It's a really big deal for us," said Salli Setta, President of Red Lobster, about the shrimp.

Red Lobster has christened them "Bigger, Better Shrimp," and will complete the transformation by mid-December. The upgrade affects about 70% of entrees on Red Lobster's menu that feature shrimp.

Shrimp is the "single biggest protein" at Red Lobster — which prepares 80 million servings of the shellfish each year, accounting for about 45% of sales — so it's important that they make the right impression. Yet many diners, Red Lobster found, were disappointed by their size, or as one particularly distressed person lamented on Twitter, the "tiny-ass shrimp."

"People were clear in what they wanted from us," said Danielle Connor, Red Lobster's senior vice president of menu strategy and development.

As it reworked its menu over the last year, the 705-restaurant chain introduced more lobster-based dishes and wild-caught seafood. "Now, we are focused directly on shrimp," said Setta. "I think we all were dreaming about shrimp." This summer, it started by updating its shrimp cocktail.

If you're wondering how Red Lobster arrived at the remarkably specific size increase of 47%, it's a figure derived from how commodity shrimp are sold. There is a standard range of shrimp sizes, Connor explained.

Red Lobster

For its Shrimp Skewers served during lunch, Red Lobster previously carried "Small" shrimp, a size that indicates about 51 to 60 shrimp per pound, and has now moved to "Medium Large" shrimp, which have about 36 to 40 shrimp per pound, for the dish — a 47% increase. Other dishes got even more dramatic upgrades. The shrimp in the Shrimp Scampi grew by 58%, jumping from "Medium" to "Large." The shrimp in the Shrimp Skewers served during dinner jumped three sizes from "Medium" to "Extra Large," getting 86% bigger.

Of course, there are even burlier shrimp in the market, such as Extra Jumbo (16 to 20 shrimp per pound, which Red Lobster uses in its shrimp cocktail), Colossal (fewer than 15 shrimp per pound), and Extra Colossal (fewer than 10 shrimp per pound). Red Lobster said it settled on these new sizes based on consumer tests, including a trial in 38 restaurants that began in March.

In addition to upsizing, Red Lobster also will start preparing the Shrimp Scampi in restaurants and added "enough scampi sauce to dip their Cheddar Bay Biscuits in," Connor said, a demand that came straight from consumers. In skewers, the shrimp will now be skewered both at the top and bottom so they form a C-shape. "We heard our guests tell us that that presentation signals quality and care," she said.

"We didn't just improve against guest feedback," Setta said. As the shrimp got larger, "We actually even started surprising and delighting as well." Who ever said bigger isn't better?

Craig Brown / Red Lobster

Two Nonprofits That Fight Evictions Are Getting Kicked Out Of Their Offices

To make way for more WeWork spaces.

The Grim Reaper at the door of 995 Market Street in August.

William Alden / BuzzFeed News

Two San Francisco nonprofits that help low-income tenants avoid eviction are — wait for it — being forced out of their offices. They say their space, on the 11th floor of an office tower in downtown San Francisco's Market Street, will be taken over by shared office space provider WeWork.

The two groups, the Eviction Defense Collaborative and Tenants Together, plan to throw themselves an "eviction party" on December 2 to raise money to cover the costs of new space.

"We're being evicted. Like so many in the Bay Area, Tenants Together and the The Eviction Defense Collaborative of San Francisco are being PRICED OUT of our homes," they wrote on the event page. The two groups did not respond to requests for comment.

A WeWork spokesperson confirmed that the company would be taking over the floors. It is also extending an olive branch of sorts to the ousted nonprofits: they're free to re-rent space in their former office once it re-opens as a WeWork shared office space.

"WeWork leased space from a landlord after the previous tenant's lease was up," said the spokesperson. "We have reached out to them and would happily welcome them as members."

Sub-leasing WeWork office space would likely cost the groups significantly more than the rent they have paid over the past decade at the location. The WeWork spokesperson declined to clarify what the company would charge the nonprofits, and one of the nonprofits has said it is close to signing a lease on a new space.

The tenuous status of the nonprofits' offices first emerged in August, when workers at Carpenters Union Local 22 in San Francisco noted that WeWork's gradual takeover of the building would likely displace a number of long-running tenants, including groups dedicated to helping people avoid eviction.

During a union protest in the neighborhood this summer, a mock grim reaper was stationed outside the building at 995 Market Street. At the time, WeWork had already leased a number of floors of the building.

Fliers handed out by members of the Carpenters Union in the summer warned, "Don't let WeWork move San Francisco workers, wages and benefits back in time!" (Since June, on the East Coast, WeWork had clashed with workers backed by Service Employees International Union local 32BJ in New York and Boston over their use of subcontractors to pay sub-union rates for building cleaners. In October, the company pledged to stop using non-union shops in the two cities.)

Via Will Alden

Eviction Defense Collaborative executive director Paul Cohen told San Francisco magazine the group is close to finalizing a deal to lease a new office space, with rent set to more than double from the $14,000 a month it was paying at 995 Market.

And while the new space means higher bills, it offers one advantage for the anti-eviction activists: it's currently empty. "I don't think we're displacing anyone where we're going," he told the magazine. "We feel very good about that."

The Collaborative's lease runs out at the end of the year, and building owner Long Market Property Partners did not offer to renew, according to San Francisco Magazine. Calls to Long Market Property Partners this week went unanswered.


View Entire List ›

Tesla Is Recalling All Model S Sedans Over Possible Seatbelt Problem

Johannes Eisele / AFP / Getty Images

Tesla is issuing a voluntary recall of its Model S sedans over a possible seatbelt defect.

The company notified customers of the recall on Friday, saying a Model S in Europe had a "front seat belt that was not properly connected to the outboard lap pretensioner."

The company said that the car was not involved in a crash and there were no injuries, but that "in the event of a crash, a seatbelt in this condition would not provide full protection." Tesla says it has inspected "over 3,000 vehicles...and found no issues."

The electric car maker has had to issue voluntary recalls before. Last year it recalled 29,000 power adapters that could overheat during charging and start fires; the company also rolled out new software it said would fix the problem. In 2010, the company launched a voluntary recall for some of its Roadster models due a power cable that "chafed against the edge of a carbon fiber panel in the vehicle causing a short, smoke and possible fire."

Tesla told customers Friday that they could inspect the seat belts themselves "by pulling very firmly on the lap portion of your seat belt with a force of at least 80 pounds."

The company's stock fell about 2.5% in response to the news of the recall.

Here is the email Tesla is sending to customers

We are sending you this email to inform you of a proactive action Tesla is taking to ensure your safety. Tesla recently found a Model S in Europe with a front seat belt that was not properly connected to the outboard lap pretensioner. This vehicle was not involved in a crash and there were no injuries. However, in the event of a crash, a seatbelt in this condition would not provide full protection. First and foremost, we care about your safety.

This is the only customer vehicle we know of with this condition. Even though we have since inspected the seat belts in over 3,000 vehicles spanning the entire range of Model S production and found no issues, we have decided to conduct a voluntary recall as a proactive and precautionary measure to inspect all front Model S seat belts and make absolutely sure that they are properly connected. (We have no concerns regarding seat belts in the rear of Model S.)

Our records indicate you own a Model S affected by this voluntary recall. We will be sending you an official recall notice by mail, but you don’t need to wait for this notice to schedule your free inspection.

[...]

If you are concerned about the status of your seatbelt prior to your scheduled inspection, you may be able to detect this condition by pulling very firmly on the lap portion of your seat belt with a force of at least 80 pounds. This procedure may detect an improperly attached seat belt but performing this procedure does not replace the need for an inspection by a Tesla technician.

Thank you for your ongoing support. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions

Thursday 19 November 2015

Banana Republic Is Gap's Black Eye Right Now

The brand has had a horrible year. Gap’s CEO referred to its performance as “a real disappointment” on an earnings call today.

Banana Republic / Via bananarepublic.gap.com

In a cruel season for retailers, Banana Republic is in an especially bad place.

Its owner Gap Inc. said today that Banana Republic's comparable sales, a measure that excludes the impact of new stores, fell 12% in the third quarter compared to the same period last year, following declines of 4% in the second quarter and 8% in the first quarter. The company, which lowered its profit forecast for the year, also saw a drop at the Gap brand for a seventh straight quarter, making Old Navy its only real hot performer.

Banana Republic has "been a real disappointment to me and a bit of a surprise," CEO Art Peck said on an earnings call today. "I expected Banana to be in a better spot in the back half of the year...I was really hoping we would get more traction with the new design direction. Obviously, we've made some changes in design and we made that really quickly when we felt like we weren't where we needed to be."

Peck appeared to be alluding to last month's exit of designer Marissa Webb, who was hired as Banana Republic's creative director and executive vice president of design in April 2014. Webb is now a creative adviser to the brand and is spending more time on her own label, which Gap invested in when it hired her.

Gap hoped that Webb, who spent more than a decade at J.Crew and also worked at Polo and Club Monaco, would reenergize Banana Republic and give it more authority in the fashion world. She didn't design clothes but was "responsible for everything customers buy and see, including advertisements and the design of the stores," the New York Times said in a feature about her New York loft last year.

When Webb's position was eliminated last month, Peck told Bloomberg News that customers had been "clear" that Banana's women's clothing "doesn't fit well." He added: "It's not as versatile or flattering as it should be given the price point."

Customer comments on Banana Republic's Facebook page

Customer comments on Banana Republic's Facebook page

Banana Republic / Via Facebook: BananaRepublic

On Banana Republic's homepage, the company is selling $80 sweaters, $128 faux-shearling vests and $90 cashmere-blend cardigans.

The chain has typically been a go-to for stylish workwear, but has joined J.Crew among one successful brandsthat are struggling to appeal to women this year. Their struggles come as shoppers enjoy an ever-wider array of alternatives, and have developed higher expectations of retailers charging premium prices.

"The problem Banana Republic appears to be having is one of remaining relevant in the face of a changing consumer and a more competitive environment," Liz Dunn, founder and CEO of consulting firm Talmage Advisors, told BuzzFeed News. "The product has been inconsistent in terms of styling and fit. Meanwhile the consumer now has more options for fashion discovery. She is following fashion bloggers, shopping European imports and online boutiques. She is looking for fashion curation and brands with personality and a strong point of view. It is no longer enough to look passably put together for work."

Banana made up 18% of Gap Inc.'s $16.4 billion in annual sales last year, making it less than half the size of the Old Navy and Gap brands. Banana Republic's comparable sales were unchanged last year and fell 1% the year before.

Peck said that products at Gap and Banana will show "material improvement" by spring of next year.

"We know what the issues are with our product and we're addressing those pretty systematically," he said. "I spend a lot of time reading reviews of our product online, and our customers are really clear in telling us what we're doing well and what we're not doing well."


View Entire List ›

A New Salmon Becomes First The Genetically Modified Animal Approved For Sale As Food

Daj / Getty Images

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today that it has approved a genetically modified salmon for sale in the U.S. This is the first genetically modified animal approved for sale as food. The FDA does not require it to be labelled as genetically modified.

The product, called AquAdvantage salmon, was designed to grow faster and with less feed than conventional salmon. It was developed by AquaBounty Technologies, a publicly traded biotechnology company based in Maynard, Mass. It is a subsidiary of Intrexon, is a Maryland-based "synthetic biology" company with revenues of nearly $72 million and net loss of $81.8 million in 2014.

The key advantage of most genetically engineered food, including plant crops like corn and soybeans already in the U.S. food system, is efficiency. AquaBounty claims the new salmon requires 20-25% less feed than any other farmed Atlantic salmon on the market today.

Salmon is now the second most popular seafood in the U.S. after shrimp, but the potential market for AqAdvantage salmon is not clear. Large grocery retailers like Whole Foods and Kroger have policies against selling genetically engineered seafood, according to the activist group Friends of the Earth, which opposes genetically modified food. It's not just genetically tinkered meat: a number of fast food chains said they have no plans to carry a new GE apple that does not brown, for example. Such consumer aversion to genetically modified organisms has led brands like Ben & Jerry's ice cream, Cheerios cereal, and the restaurant chain Chipotle to go GMO-free.

The FDA determined that "food from AquAdvantage Salmon is as safe to eat and as nutritious as food from other non-GE Atlantic salmon."

A rendering of the salmon farming facility on AquaBounty's site.

AquaBounty / Via aquabounty.com

As for the environmental impact if the fast-growing salmon escape into the wild, AquAdvantage salmon are all female and are reproductively sterile. The approved fish may be raised in land-based facilities in Canada and Panama with "multiple and redundant physical barriers to prevent eggs and fish from escaping," according to the FDA, which will oversee the facilities. The AquAdvantage fish are not approved to be bred or raised in the U.S.

The company did not reply to an email inquiry about the FDA approval.

Other genetically engineered meats could be on the way. According to a statement from Friends of the Earth, more than 35 other species of genetically engineered fish, along with chickens, pigs and cows, are currently under development, and "the FDA’s decision on this genetically engineered salmon application sets a precedent for other genetically engineered fish and animals."

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images


Square Gets Slight Pop, Opens At $11.20

Jeff Chiu / AP

Shares for the payment processing and business software company Square debuted on the New York Stock Exchange at $11.20, above the $9 where it priced the shares last night. The shares are continuing to rise, trading at around $13.50, a nearly 50% jump.

The slight rise follows a humiliating stepdown in pricing and expectations for the fast-growing — but loss making — company founded and led by Twitter chief executive Jack Dorsey, who turned 39 today. The $9-a-share price valued the company at around half the $6 billion valuation it gained in private markets last year and was even below the $11.02-a-share price paid by investors in a previous private fundraising round in 2012.

The company was forced to issue more shares as part of an agreement with late investors. The agreement guaranteed them additional shares so the investors would get a 20% return on their stake in the company — even if the company's valuation went down in its IPO.

But just because the company experiences a slight pop on its first day — locking in some gains for the investors with the clout and relationships with investment banks to buy at the initial price — that doesn't guarantee a smooth journey up and to the right.

The craft marketplace Etsy, which sold shares at $16 and then saw its stock price shoot up to $31 on its first day of trading in April, is now languishing at around $8. The business software company Box also went public at a discount to its last private valuation, and then saw its stock price rise on its first day of trading early this year to over $23 and is now trading at just over $13, below the $14 where it priced its shares.

CNBC host Jim Cramer described Square's pricing as "brilliant," saying it was "what has to be done to move this merchandise."



A College Watchdog Finally Barked, So The Colleges Got A New Dog

Job seekers meet with a recruiter during a job and career fair at City College of San Francisco in 2013.

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

In its battle against poor-performing colleges, the Obama administration has dubbed their accreditors the "watchdogs that rarely bite." Despite operating as gatekeepers that decide who is and isn't a legitimate college — and who is entitled to federal student loan dollars — accreditors almost never take serious action against troubled schools.

Now, the accreditor behind the most visible attempt in recent years to crack down on a college is being sidelined by the education industry it is meant to monitor.

In 2013, the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges moved to threaten the credentials of California's largest public college, the City College of San Francisco. The accreditor said the college had serious problems with financial stability and governance that had gone unaddressed for years. If City College didn't fix those problems in a year, it said, the school's students would no longer be able to receive federal financial aid dollars — essentially guaranteeing it would have to shut down.

This week, leaders of California community colleges voted to oust ACCJC, months after a report by a state task force said the organization was too punitive and had "lost credibility with the system," focusing too much on regulatory compliance rather than school quality. Faced with a watchdog that bites, the schools have chosen to get a new dog.

In the high-profile shutdown of the for-profit Corinthian Colleges, part of the blame has been placed on the schools' accreditor, ACICS, which had year after year given the stamp of approval to Corinthian's schools. After Corinthian collapsed, ACICS' director was grilled in front of a Senate committee about why the agency had renewed Corinthian's accreditation while it was being sued by three separate state attorneys general and a federal agency for lying to its students.

The drama playing out in California is an example of the risks of relying on accreditors as the sole gatekeepers of federal funding — and of trusting that they will take action against failing schools. Accreditors are membership organizations made up of the colleges they are tasked with overseeing; this means they are funded with membership fees from the very schools whose credentials they have the power, at least theoretically, to revoke.

And if colleges aren't happy with how that oversight is working, they can withdraw their membership and find a new accreditor, as the California schools voted to do this week.

"Accreditors weren't structured to be the watchdog," said Russell Poulin, the director of policy and analysis at the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. "They were started as an organization to work collegially to improve one another. But the Department of Education has been essentially outsourcing oversight to these agencies."

City College of San Francisco, which enrolls some 80,000 students, fought back tooth and nail when ACCJC threatened its accreditation, filing a lawsuit that accused the accreditor of a flawed and biased process. It largely lost the suit, but ACCJC granted the school a two-year extension to fix its problems.

Now, along with all of California's community colleges, City College of San Francisco will get a new accreditor.

"It points out the reasons that the accreditors rarely bite," said Amy Laitinen, the director for higher education at the New America Foundation. "It's much too politically fraught. Accreditors are risk averse, and the City College of San Francisco example shows why."

"It's the 'too big to fail' mentality," Laitinen said of the backlash against the closing of City College.

Critics of ACCJC have said the accreditor has its own serious problems — that it was too rigid and focused on forcing colleges to comply with small governance and financial rules, rather than making sure that schools provided a quality education to students.

That is a symptom of another systemic problem with accreditors: thanks to a Congressional mandate, the Education Department is not allowed to ask them to consider any measures of institutional quality in their evaluations of colleges. Earlier this month, when it announced measures to repair the accreditation system, the Education Department could only compel increased transparency from accreditors — not higher standards or more frequent action.

"Congress has completely tied their hands on this," Laitinen said.

On Monday, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, the chairman of ACCJC made a last-minute plea to California education officials to reconsider the decision. He promised that the accreditor would do a better job of focusing on quality. But he also warned them: “If you think you’re getting away from regulatory compliance, I think you’re mistaken.”